Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼º°ß¿¡ À־ Ä¡Á¶Á¦º¸Á¸¼úÀ» À§ÇÑ Ä¡¾Æ»ÀÀ̽ÄÀçÀÇ È¿°ú

The Effect of Tooth Biomaterial for Socket Preservation in Dog

´ëÇÑÅëÇÕÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 3±Ç 2È£ p.30 ~ 45
ÁÖÇöÁß, Àåȯ¿ë, ÀÌÁø¿ë, ÀåÇö¼®, ÀÓÀç¼®, ÀÌÀǼ®,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÁÖÇöÁß ( Joo Hyun-Joong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Àåȯ¿ë ( Jang Hwan-Yong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁø¿ë ( Lee Jin-Yong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀåÇö¼® ( Jang Hyun-Seok ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓÀç¼® ( Rim Jae-Suk ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÀǼ® ( Lee Eui-Seok ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare histologic evaluation of autogenous and allogenous tooth material on bone-healing response in dog.

Materials and Methods: Allogenous tooth biomaterial was grafted in the extraction socket of the premolar region in the left lower jaws and autogenous tooth biomaterial was grafted in the right side after 2 weeks. Three dogs were sacrificed after 4, 8, 12 weeks each for histological evaluation.

Results: In the histologic analysis, there were no signigicant differences between group 1 (autogenous tooth bone biomaterial) and group 2 (allogenous tooth bone biomaterial) at 4, 8, 12 weeks. Statistical analysis showed that group 1 was more higher bone volume levels than group 2 at 4 weeks (P?0.05, Mann-whitney test). Group 2 showed more higher bone volume levels than group 1 at 8 weeks and group 1 more than group 2 at 12 weeks but that showed no significant differences (P¢´0.05, Mann-whitney test).

Conclusion: Histologically, autogenous and allogenous tooth biomaterial reveals similar healing patterns in extraction socket in dogs. The result of this study suggested that tooth biomaterials could be useful materials for socket preservation.

Å°¿öµå

Tooth biomaterial; Socket preservation; Bone regeneration

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸